Imagine a commercial dispute where documents are submitted electronically, hearings are conducted remotely, and artificial intelligence processes thousands of pages within minutes, proposing the most likely outcomes based on facts and precedents. This scenario is no longer a technical fantasy but rather an accelerating trend reshaping arbitration and the boundaries of human involvement in it.
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Arbitration
Smart electronic arbitration transcends the mere digitisation of paper-based procedures; it harnesses AI technologies to sort evidence, summarise submissions, analyse contracts, identify inconsistencies, manage schedules, and even predict potential dispute trajectories. Its true value becomes evident in cross-border commercial disputes, where it significantly reduces time and costs, enabling parties and arbitrators to engage without being confined to a single location.
Concerns Over Speed and Fairness
However, speed does not necessarily equate to enhanced fairness. An algorithm might rely on incomplete or biased data, or it may provide recommendations based on reasoning that is difficult to interpret. This technology raises significant concerns regarding document confidentiality, data protection, cybersecurity, participant identity verification, and ensuring that witnesses remain unaffected. Should a technical glitch inhibit one party from presenting their defence, the innovation itself could become a point of contestation against the ruling or impede its enforcement.
The UAE’s Legal Framework for Smart Arbitration
In the United Arab Emirates, the amended arbitration law provides a flexible foundation for conducting either in-person or virtual arbitration using modern technological means. However, the digitisation of procedures does not confer independent adjudicative power to machines. The arbitral award remains connected to the arbitrator, their impartiality, independence, understanding of the facts, ability to reason, and their capacity to balance the evidence presented.
The Future: AI-Enhanced Arbitrators
Thus, the more likely future is that of the “AI-enhanced arbitrator” rather than the “automated arbitrator.” While AI can assist in analysis, it should not replace legal and human judgment. The success of this model requires a clear agreement on the tools used, ensuring that parties are informed about their impact, discussing their results, and instituting precise rules regarding accountability, confidentiality, and data protection.
Addressing the Real Challenges
The real challenge lies not just in a technology’s ability to process a case file, but in determining who bears responsibility for its errors, the extent of disclosure regarding its use, and how its recommendations are reviewed before being incorporated into the final ruling. Intelligent justice is achieved not when algorithms deliver decisions faster, but when technology enhances the efficiency of arbitration without compromising its safeguards.
To read previous articles by the author, please click on their name.
Responsibility for the content published in opinion pieces rests solely with the author, and the newspaper does not bear any responsibility for the opinions expressed therein.